Health
Savings Accounts Issues
(PRWEB) November 14, 2004 - Health Savings Accounts HSAs may
play a significant role financing health care in the second
half of this decade after making a very quiet debut under
federal tax law at the beginning of this year. The Bush administration
strongly supports the program. They enjoy a wide base of political
popularity in the area of health care financing where there
are few other points of national consensus. Yet there are
still at least eight major problems nagging Health Savings
Accounts as we know them today:
1) Part of the "Three-Pronged Approach" Theory
President Bush promoted HSAs during his re-election campaign
as part of the administrations planned three-pronged
approach (or four-pronged approach, depending on which stump
speech you heard) to reform the U.S. health care system. The
other major "prongs" in the Presidents plan
are medical malpractice reform and the promotion of association
health plans. All three of these proposed solutions are untested.
There is actually no evidence that Health Savings Accounts
reduce overall costs when utilized by a diverse population.
Previous test groups, including those who participated in
the medical savings account pilot program have consisted largely
of younger healthy applicants. The idea behind Health Savings
Accounts is to cut out the middleman and put consumers in
charge of paying for their own routine health care expenses.
Health insurance would be used only to cover catastrophic
expenses. Consumers would naturally be more conservative in
spending their own funds and this would reduce unnecessary
consumption. In theory it sounds great. Critics argue that
since neither the employer nor the employee is actually required
to fund the account, there is no assurance that money will
be available when medical expenses are incurred. We could
wind up with a population covered only be catastrophic health
insurance and no coverage for more common medical expenses
actually a step backwards from our current position. Separately,
there is little likelihood that the many small business employers
without health plans would suddenly adapt health plans without
significant legal or financial incentives. President Bush
talked about providing refundable tax credits for small businesses
that adapt health plans early in his re-election campaign
but this program seems economically unfeasible in the near
term even with the President spending his new post-election
"political capital".
2) A Tax Shelter for the Rich
Prominent Democrats including Wisconsin Governor Jim Doyle
have called Health Savings Accounts a tax shelter for
the rich. A few years ago Business Week magazine called
medical savings accounts almost too good to be true
referring to the surprisingly generous tax advantages. (Medical
Savings Accounts were the legislative predecessor to Health
Savings Accounts). While it is certainly true that the early
adapters of health savings accounts have been well informed
and generally more affluent crowd, the promotion to the masses
has not even begun. It may simply be too early to issue a
mass condemnation of the strategy.
3) The Health Savings Plan You Cant Get
Wall Street Journal article headline about Health Savings
Accounts "The Health Savings Plan You Cant Get:
Why Employers Are Slow to Try HSAs". The fact is that
the vast majority of Americans do not qualify for a Health
Savings Account under current law. The problems are technical
or legal in nature and vary from state to state; these issues
are not discussed in this article. More discussion of the
interplay between federal and state health care policy and
insurance laws can be found in other articles Very few - far
less than one percent - of Americans can open a health savings
account today.
4) Still Too Expensive
Freedom Benefits Association handled thousands of inquiries
for health savings accounts during the first ten months of
their existence. Most of these inquiries came from people
who were looking for lower cost alternatives to traditional
health plans and then abandoned the quest for a Health Savings
Account when they saw the cost of the underlying insurance.
The basic problem is this: if you cannot afford and old-style
traditional health plan then you are not likely to be in a
position to consider a health savings account plan either.
Health Savings Accounts do save money and improve the health
care system over the long term, but they dont make health
care suddenly affordable to people who cannot afford it now.
If lowering cost immediately is the highest priority, health
savings accounts are usually not the best option. Plans with
limited coverage like "Basic Health Insurance" at
www.basichealthinsurance.net and short-term medical coverage
like those at www.MedSave.com and www.FreedomBenefits.net
offer much greater cost savings than Health Savings Accounts.
5) Wrestling for Legal Control
State laws govern health insurance. Federal law governs income
taxes. The success of Health Savings Accounts requires a coordination
of state and federal law. This just is not happening in yet
in many states. Federal law of promoting cheap high deductible
insurance is in direct opposition to the underlying intent
of most state health insurance laws that have focused on adding
mandatory coverage to health insurance. This underlying philosophical
battle may need to be resolved before Health Savings Accounts
really catch on. It might even be feasible to have federal
law pre-empt state insurance laws where Health Savings Accounts
are at issue, copying the legal approach used to control the
legal disparities in pension plans.
6) Quiet Disinterest
Banks and financial institutions are smart enough to realize
that they cant make any money offering Health Savings
Accounts to their customers. There just are not enough Health
Savings Accounts and the average account balance is too low
(something less than $1000) as compared with IRAs and other
financial products. The market is already saturated by the
handful of firms competing to offer independent Health Savings
Accounts. This is not likely to change much, even over the
next few years. Data gathered by firms who participated in
the Medical Savings Account pilot program from1996 through
2003 gave some disheartening information to other financial
companies who were considering jumping into the Health Savings
Account market. The clearest message was that there is little
money to be made competing to offer no-fee, no-load health
savings accounts. Some independent financial firms that charge
fees for Health Savings Accounts are already facing customer
resistance. One prominent Health Savings Account administrator
made significant changes last month to cut costs and hopefully
improve marketability of their products. As a result, most
financial firms are in no rush to offer Health Savings Accounts.
Likewise, the nations largest managed care health insurance
companies recognize that Health Savings Accounts are in direct
philosophical conflict with their own business model for controlling
health care costs. You can not have a patient control all
of their health care under $5,000 through their own account,
for example, and then suddenly step in and apply a managed
care approach to the catastrophic charges above $5,000. It
just will not work from a practical perspective. Managed care
companies argue that their own internal cost controls are
more effective than those built into todays health savings
account plans. This argument will remain valid until an effective
method of integrating the two approaches is available
but do not expect this type of wholehearted co-operation anytime
soon, according to some industry sources. Since these types
of managed care health plans provide care for the majority
of Americans, change might be slower than we would like to
think.
7) Missing Treasury Procedures
The Internal Revenue Service has still not determined how
to verify eligibility for Health Savings Account deductions,
or at least that information has not been made public. Current
law intentionally exempts the administrators of Health Savings
Accounts from verifying eligibility for deposits from their
customers. As a result, some plan administrators report
that they know that many of the accounts they handle are not
legitimate Health Savings Accounts. The available audit procedure
information points to the possibility of ugly surprises for
taxpayers who honestly believed they had their Health Savings
Account in order. The audit procedure used for Medical Savings
Accounts was particularly harsh on taxpayers; all deductions
were thrown out until the taxpayers could prove that they
were entitled to the benefits. There is no indication that
the audit procedure will be any different for health savings
accounts. (See the tax section of the Frequently Asked Questions
at www.healthsavingsaccount-hsa.com for more information on
tax treatment and potential problems).
8) Lack of Coordination in Claims Processing
There is also some concern that double-billing problems may
occur when health care providers bill both the patients
health insurance plan as well as the individuals health
savings account. Duel billing is already the prevailing practice
in the medical service accounting but health insurers have
a well-developed process for coordinating the claims made
to multiple payment sources. There is no similar safeguard
in Health Savings Accounts. Since there is no required claim
co-ordination between the Health Savings Account and the health
insurance plan, it is possible that both could pay the same
medical bills. This shortsighted accounting problem might
be addressed as health plans evolve to a higher level of sophistication
with claims processing.
Health Savings Accounts are a great concept and really produce
great benefits for the few who have them, but they are far
from a significant part of the solution to our national health
care crisis. More information on this topic will surely follow
in coming weeks. For now, it is clear to say that Health Savings
Accounts are no more than a drop in the bucket of possible
solutions to our national health care crisis.
http://www.healthsavingsaccount-hsa.com/
|